Invesco's warrant offer removes last remnant of Slater's time
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.INVESCO, the fund manager formerly known as Invesco MIM, Britannia Arrow and Slater Walker Securities, is getting rid of the last vestige of the time when Jim Slater ran the group by buying in its pounds 2.3m worth of perpetual warrants issued 22 years ago, writes Jason Nisse.
At a meeting to be held today, investors in the highly unusual securities are expected to vote for a proposal that will allow Invesco compulsorily to purchase the warrants.
The group has made a generous offer, giving warrant holders four shares for every three warrants held at a price of 50p each when the warrants actually only allow the holders to convert at 140p, although they can do it at any time. Invesco's shares stood at 143p yesterday, thus valuing the warrants at 124p each compared with a closing price of 110p.
Michael Perman, Invesco's company secretary, said the warrants were issued in 1971 as a kicker to a fund-raising by Slater Walker Securities. 'There is nothing else like them in any listed company,' he said. 'Every single other warrant is time-sensitive, but these are not, so it is impossible for brokers to accurately price them.'
Mr Perman said Invesco was willing to pay over the odds because it would save thousands of pounds in administration costs.
However, not everyone is happy about the offer. George Brett, an 18- year-old business studies student, was given some when he was a child. 'My family wish to continue as warrant holders as I have a life expectancy of more than 50 years.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments