Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Internal report urges Lloyd's to spread risks outside its market

John Moore,Assistant City Editor
Wednesday 08 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE AUTHORITIES of Lloyd's should set a limit on the amount of insurance an underwriting member can buy within the market when he is engaged in insuring other Lloyd's members against large losses, an internal report has concluded.

The recommendation is in a report prepared by Michael Lickiss, senior partner of Grant Thornton, the chartered accountants. Mr Lickiss had been asked by Lloyd's to probe the circumstances surrounding losses involving two pure personal stop-loss insurance syndicates, 134 and 184, managed by PSL Services, formerly Mackinnon Hayter & Co.

The syndicates had insured other members against possible large losses. Instead the syndicates, of about 240 members, sustained losses of more than pounds 30m.

In the 100-page report Mr Lickiss - together with Robin Wilshaw, a director of the R J Kiln underwriting agency, and Frank Guaschi, a partner of Bacon and Woodrow, consulting actuaries - said: 'Our review was not a disciplinary investigation. It has not been part of our responsibility to apportion blame.'

The investigators noted that there had been a big concentration of personal stop-loss risks at syndicates 134 and 184 as a result of the professional underwriter Colin Mackinnon buying what transpired to be insufficient insurance protection to provide for large losses that might have fallen on the two syndicates.

The losses largely fell on the two syndicates' 1983 trading accounts. Mr Mackinnon told the investigators that prior to 1986 his organisation did not have a computer facility to run claims projections through on individual policies. 'It was me doing it manually with a pocket calculator and handwritten schedules,' he said.

The investigators observed that the auditors Neville Russell did not question some of Mr Mackinnon's assumptions on the likely level of claims and the auditors told the investigators that ' we are satisfied that . . . at the time this was the right approach.'

The investigators recommend that personal stop-loss syndicates should lay off part of their risks outside the market in order to prevent losses spiralling within the market. They also recommend Lloyd's to give clear guidelines the information it expects to see in a professional underwriters' report.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in