InterCapital fund manager banned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Imro, the investment watchdog, yesterday banned a fund manager for "knowingly and deliberately" overvaluing warrants held by a fund managed by InterCapital Asset Management.
Geoffrey de Siebert, a former chief executive of InterCapital, was found by Imro not to have exercised "the integrity of a registered individual" when he inflated the value of the warrants between April 1994 and March 1995. His ban is one of only a handful ever meted out by Imro and is seen as a sign of the regulator's increasingly hard-line policy towards code violations.
Imro said the effect of Mr de Siebert's actions was to overvalue one of InterCapital's funds by up to pounds 9.7m, or 25 per cent of the fund's correct valuation. Investors were disadvantaged because the fund's performance appeared better than it was.
Imro also found that Mr de Siebert had undertaken foreign contract positions between July 1994 and December 1994 for speculative purposes on behalf of the fund, breaching its articles of association. At the end of 1994, the fund held forward foreign exchange contracts worth pounds 53.2m, again in breach of InterCapital's articles.
"Imro does not consider Mr de Siebert to be fit and proper to act as a registered individual," the regulator concluded. Mr de Siebert was ordered pay Imro's costs of pounds 5,000.
Separately, Imro fined Newton Investment Management pounds 85,000 for breaches of rules relating to overdrafts on client money accounts.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments