Insurers forced to blow whistle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government is to change the law on pension schemes by forcing insurance companies to "whistle-blow" if they do not receive contributions owed to them by employers.
Hundreds of thousands of people may be affected by the proposed rule change to group personal pensions, one of the fastest-growing types of schemes in Britain today.
Under the new rules, insurers will have to tell policyholders if contributions already deducted from their pay packets are not paid in by their employers within three months of the date they were due.
Officials at the Department of Social Security moved to tighten up the law after hearing that some employers fail to hand over contributions for years at a time. If the firms were to go bust, those contributions could be lost.
The changes, still to be agreed by the Occupational Pension Board, follow discussions between the DSS and the City watchdog, the Securities and Investments Board.
Gareth Marr, managing director at the independent financial advisers Moores Marr Bradley, said: "Group personal pensions are increasingly popular because employers who want to provide this benefit for their employees do not have to go through the same rigmarole as with occupational pension schemes." He said he had recently spoken to Peter Lilley, the Social Security Minister, pointing out a gap which could be exploited by some unscrupulous employers. Not all insurers had rules in place to cope if this were to happen.
The Association of British Insurers said, however: "The principle behind the changes mirror procedures already in place with many of our members."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments