Insurer predicts pounds 6m costs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TRADE Indemnity, the insurance and credit-risk company, said it was unlikely the net cost to its profits of an Appeal Court decision last week on compensation for pensioners would exceed pounds 6m, writes Peter Rodgers. The pensioners lost money on home income plans.
The company said its exposure was linked to the bankruptcy of small financial services companies following the collapse of their home income plans, whereby pensioners sell their houses for a percentage of market value but retain the right to live in them for life.
Trade Indemnity's exposure stems from an insurance policy taken out by the Investor's Compensation Scheme. Last week the court removed the scheme's freedom to put a ceiling on compensation claims from pensioners. So far pounds 22m has been paid out but the door is now open to new claims.
Home income plans proved a disaster when property and financial markets crashed but interest rates on mortgages rose, causing a flood of compensation claims.
Trade Indemnity said it could not quantify the cost, but its estimate was after reinsurance on a policy it wrote in April 1990, expiring in March 1992.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments