Insolvency report sparks legal challenge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE INDEPENDENT Insurance group yesterday started legal proceedings against the Institute of Insurance Brokers following assertions earlier this week that the group's solvency, along with the solvency of 16 other large insurance companies, has been dramatically eroded over the past two years.
In one of the worst rows in recent times between an insurance group and a brokers' body, Independent said that remarks made this week by the institute suggested that it was not financially secure.
Other companies among the 17 named have also consulted lawyers about their inclusion in the institute's list, which has been widely criticised by independent City analysts.
The 950-member institute, which is trying to market a survey based on its statistical analysis at pounds 720 a year, was formed as a breakaway movement from the British Insurance and Investment Brokers Association.
Robert McCracken, a director and assistant general manager of Independent, said yesterday: 'The comments made by Andrew Paddick (the head of the institute) and the institute were totally unjustified as far as Independent Insurance is concerned.
'We are a company dedicated to the broker market, and so are astonished at what has happened, particularly in view of our close relationship with the institute and its members.'
Independent, established in 1987, said Mr Paddick had issued a retraction. 'We now trust our brokers and clients will immediately disassociate us from this sorry affair.'
The institute had asserted that its survey of 70 insurance companies suggested that 17 insurance companies had collectively lost half their free reserves (shareholders' funds) in less than two years.
The institute said the losses had occurred in spite of periodic injections of new capital.
'Some of them individually showed much more serious decline,' the institute added.
The institute has 950 insurance broking members.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments