Inside Business: Marketing staff work 'miracles'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than 80 per cent of marketing professionals believe that a strong brand "is money in the bank and is critically important in business- to-business marketing". Yet 60 per cent of them also feel their companies are not giving sufficient support to their brands, according to research just published.
Gary Howells, of specialist business-to-business advertising agency CHJS, which conducted the survey of 700 marketing professionals, said the findings showed that companies were not "putting their money where their mouth is". He added that marketing managers often felt they were "required to work miracles on the budget they were given".
However, the report also found that businesses perceived they were getting better value for money from marketing activities such as telemarketing and seminars, in which they were in direct contact with customers, than from more distant media, such as television and press campaigns. "This was surprising given the efforts to make advertisements more accountable," Mr Howells said.
The top five marketing channels in terms of return on investment were held to be: public relations, database marketing, direct mail, distributor/dealer activity and seminars. This list was close - but not identical - to the top five budget priorities: public relations, direct mail, exhibitions, trade press advertising and database marketing.
Only exhibitions have a poorer perceived return than the priority given them. On the other hand, radio advertising, regional press advertising and telemarketing all have a perceived return on investment dramatically ahead of their share of the budget.
CHJS intends to monitor the effects of developments, such as the growth of the Internet, to update the findings at regular intervals. But Mr Howells believes that, even with these moves, the market may not be changing as much as observers think.
"People talk about the haemorrhaging of money towards direct mail. But it's not that huge," he said. "You can't build a brand with direct mail. You've got to use high-profile channels like television and posters."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments