ICA under fire over 'pathetic' Jordan fine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Institute of Chartered Accountants has been heavily criticised by members over the limited penalties on Michael Jordan and Richard Stone, the administrators of Polly Peck International, for breach of ethics rules.
Accountants in industry and public practice claim the pounds 1,000 fines and reprimands imposed on Mr Jordan and Mr Stone by the institute's disciplinary committee on Thursday undermine the public's confidence in the profession's ability to regulate itself.
The fines were the maximum available at the time of the offence, but the disciplinary committee could have taken away their practising licences.
Mr Jordan, senior partner of Cork Gully, the insolvency practice, and Mr Stone, a partner with Coopers & Lybrand, which incorporates Cork Gully, were found to have failed to comply with the institute's by-laws in accepting the Polly Peck appointment in October 1990, when their firm had a potential conflict of interest through advising the company.
Douglas Llambias, who runs an accountancy recruitment firm, said: 'To be found guilty and fined pounds 1,000 looks like a total whitewash.'
Austin Mitchell, the Labour MP who has long been a fervent critic of the professions, supported the outcry, calling the decision 'a pathetic response'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments