Hydro sued for pounds 25m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Scottish electricity company, Hydro-Electric, is being sued for pounds 25m by a small specialist energy consultancy which alleges that it reneged on a joint venture deal and poached a key member of staff.
A writ was served by Sterling Energy Equities UK on Hydro-Electric last month and the Court of Session in Edinburgh has given the plaintiffs leave to proceed with the claim.
The case centres around a five-year agreement that Hydro-Electric and Sterling entered into in 1994 to provide energy management and generation systems for industrial sites.
One of the projects the joint venture was working on was a pounds 200m development of a 500-acre site in Mossend, Lanarkshire, including the installation of co-generation equipment.
Last October, however, the agreement was terminated. Sterling alleges that Hydro- Electric also "enticed away" one of its project team, Martin Thomas, a computer specialist.
Sterling claims in its writ that the anticipated return from the Lanarkshire development would have been pounds 100m over the next 20 years. The company, which had a 20 per cent stake in the joint venture with Hydro, is claiming pounds 25.5m in damages plus interest. Most of the claim relates to revenues it says it will forgo but some is understood to relate to Mr Thomas's services.
A spokesman for Sterling said: "We did have a relationship with Hydro that ended acrimoniously and it is now the subject of litigation." The company, he added, had been advised by its Edinburgh solicitors, Simpson and Marwick, not to comment any further.
A spokesman for Hydro-Electric said: "We intend to defend this action vigorously."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments