Horton put on the spot as Railtrack investors question safety standards
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Railtrack came under pressure yesterday from investors at its maiden annual general meeting over the company's failure to spend the planned amount on its Asset Maintenance Plan, writes Christian Wolmar.
Jonathan Bray, a shareholder and a member of the Save our Railways pressure group, quizzed Bob Horton, chairman (pictured), over why Railtrack spent pounds 333m instead of a planned pounds 483m in 1994/95 and pounds 386m instead of pounds 503m last year.
The reason, Mr Horton said, was because Railtrack was in a transitional state following privatisation, being unable to borrow money or to get the cash from the Treasury.
Shareholders at the Barbican Centre in London were told that Railtrack's performance on safety had improved, but it was unable to give answers to questions on whether the number of potentially dangerous incidents had gone up or down in the past year.
Photograph: Edward Sykes
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments