Hogg urges pension funds to act
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN EISENHAMMER
IN EASTBOURNE
Pension funds, by far the biggest investors in British industry, must take a more active stance as shareholders in ensuring that companies are properly run and perform well, a leading industrialist said yesterday.
Sir Christopher Hogg, chairman of Courtaulds and Reuters, warned managers of pension funds, which own 35 per cent of the equity market, that: "You have a social duty, and if you do not do it you will find it done for you by the Government."
Several speakers on the final day of the National Association of Pension Funds' investment conference criticised fund managers for their absentee landlord role. Alastair Ross Gooby, head of PosTel, Britain's largest pension fund and a vigorous campaigner for a more active shareholder approach, said: "Most companies will tell you shareholders do not exercise their responsibilities. This has got to change, and I think at last it is beginning to do so."
Graham Allen, the head of ICI investment management, pointed to a risk from another quarter. "If we are not careful, UK pension funds are in grave danger of discovering that, through their inertia, a small minority of US investors are determining the outcome of contentious issues".
Several senior fund managers said privately the executive pay row has highlighted the need for a more interventionist approach.
Sir Christopher said the damage over executive pay had been caused by a handful of firms. But he cautioned that executive remuneration, because of its complexity, is not a matter for shareholder control. "Non-executive directors have a clear edge over shareholders when it comes to judging annually the performance of executive directors," he said.
Comment, page 16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments