Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Grid pulled from the privatisation wreckage

Comment

Wednesday 25 October 1995 20:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Screaming and shouting, the 12 regional electricity companies have finally been forced into line on flotation of the National Grid. Barring another hiccup, the shares should begin trading on 11 December. If anyone can take the credit for this, it is Tim Eggar, the Energy Minister. Without him, it almost certainly wouldn't have happened at all.

By the end, at least half the Recs were opposed, some more vehemently than others. It was not always thus. Originally, there was virtual unanimity of support. That, however, was at a time when the Recs anticipated some benefit to themselves in terms of a substantial cash windfall. It soon evaporated.

Indeed, some of the newcomers to the industry, Hanson and Southern Electric of the US, thought the rewards of flotation to themselves so poor that they withdrew support and became obstructive. They used the complex negotiations over detail as a way of promoting their own objections in principle. To Hanson and the Americans, the idea that the Government should decide what they should do with an important asset was anathema. It was only the threat of a windfall profits tax that beat them into submission.

For its part, the Government secures on behalf of the consumer a pounds 50 per bill rebate, thus mitigating some of the criticism it has encountered for failing to realise the value of the National Grid when the Recs were privatised. This is hardly going to save a government as unpopular as this one, but at least Mr Eggar has salvaged something from the electoral wreckage of privatisation policy.

An accounting standard for the Eighties

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in