Government urged to let bank off the leash
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Japanese government was advised yesterday to loosen control of its central bank in a set of recommendations which would mark the first hesitant steps towards an independent Bank of Japan, writes Richard Lloyd Parry.
In proposals which could become law as early as next January, a government- sponsored panel urged the Prime Minister, Ryutaro Hashimoto, to abolish the rules that allow him to sack bank officials at will and in effect to veto policy decisions. While stopping far short of a Bundesbank-style arrangement, they would allow the BoJ's governor more leeway in formulating monetary policy.
"We have now made the first step to securing the Bank of Japan's independence," Yasuhiko Torii, president of Tokyo's Keio University and chairman of the study group said yesterday. "If these ideas materialise, we will have a central bank on a par with those of other advanced countries."
The 1942 law under which the Bank of Japan is presently constituted, gives politicians considerable power over the bank, both direct and indirect. The governor and his executives can be dismissed for disagreeing with government policy, and their board always contains senior bureaucrats from the finance ministry and economic planning agency. Under the new proposals, government officials would no longer be formal members of the board.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments