Government under pressure on pay perks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government faces fresh pressure to legislate on share options and bonus schemes from a Labour Party now ready to require such payments to have the prior approval of shareholders.
The committee chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury, chairman of Marks and Spencer, due to report this summer to John Major on boardroom pay, is expected to give its strong backing to more say for shareholders in determining share option and bonus payments.
It has also made clear its distaste for share option packages, which have recently rewarded top executives with controversially-sized remuneration increases, preferring long-term bonus schemes.
But the committee, which meets again this week, and probably again in July, has not so far thrown its weight behind any recommendation for legislation and there are no signs that it intends to do so. A document going through Labour's policy-making machinery would require not only disclosure of each director's pay and bonus package to shareholders, but also require companies to seek shareholder approval before they are implemented.
A further Labour document also calls for greater transparency by pension fund managers on how they vote at annual meetings of companies in which they invest.
This second proposal has been given new momentum by Labour claims that the Post Office, British Telecom, BBC and Associated Newspapers pension funds all backed the 71 per cent pay increase for Cedric Brown, chief executive of British Gas, which was angrily attacked at last week's shareholders' meeting.
John Edmonds, leader of the GMB general union, yesterday railed against the block vote wielded by City investors in support of big boardroom salaries. He said the GMB wanted to ensure that votes at company AGMs were cast by shareholders themselves, and should be recorded and open to public scrutiny.
Speaking at his union's conference in Brighton, Mr Edmonds said: "We've seen the abuse of shareholder democracy at the British Gas AGM. We also know that companies make key decisions without consulting their shareholders.
"Our campaign will expose the Square Mile mandarins who control billions of pounds and wield enormous power.
"They use ordinary people's money through pension schemes and building societies and yet we don't even know their names," he said.
Gordon Brown, the Shadow Chancellor, said yesterday that the current tax privileges for share option schemes must be removed and added: "Without a commitment to legislate, abuses will continue."
If, as some ministers expect, the Greenbury committee stops short of proposing legislation it will leave Mr Major in a difficult situation.
There are powerful forces in government arguing that legislation is politicially necessary - not least because of the stream of fresh disclosures, such as that of another National Power director last week cashing in share options at a profit of over pounds 500,000.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments