Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Government considers pulling plug on ICL benefit claim system

Peter Thal Larsen
Wednesday 18 February 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A pounds 1.5bn project to replace Benefits Agency order books and Giro cheques with plastic payment cards and to computerise all Post Offices appeared close to collapse last night.

Following a series of delays and technical hitches, the Government is thought to be increasingly concerned about the likelihood of ICL, the computer services company, completing the contract.

PA, the consulting firm, has been asked to look at the options for the project, while the Departments of Social Security and Trade and Industry are holding a series of high-level discussions about the best way to proceed with it.

One option under consideration is understood to be the termination of the contract with ICL Pathway, the ICL subsidiary which is running the project. According to industry sources, rival computer services companies have been approached about taking it over.

A DSS spokesman said: "We meet DTI ministers on a regular basis and this is one of the issues under discussion. We are discussing the problems at the moment." But an ICL Pathway official denied there were problems: "This contract is running according to an agreed plan. There is no consideration of the government pulling out." The Post Office said it remained committed to the project.

The project, which is the largest information technology (IT) contract ever awarded under the private finance initiative (PFI), was awarded to ICL in 1996 amid fierce competition. It envisaged issuing 20 million benefit claimants around the country with plastic "smart cards" with which they could claim pensions, income support, child benefit and disability benefit.

Payments would be made through 19,000 post offices around the country, which would be linked up to a central computer system. The system was intended to reduce social security fraud by pounds 150m a year.

The system was originally supposed to be up and running by the middle of 1998. However, it has been beset by delays. At the moment it has been installed in just 205 post offices, and only issues child benefit.

ICL Pathway insisted that the project was on schedule to be ready by a revised target of the middle of the year 2000. But industry experts say the system faces a number of serious technical hurdles.

Problems are thought to centre on the complexity of certain social security payments, such as income support, and the need to link the Post Office computer system to the Benefits Agency's system. It is thought that the software being used by ICL may be ill-equipped to deal with a project of this size. In addition, staff are believed to be leaving the project as they fear they are unlikely to receive bonuses related to work being completed on time.

The delays are a serious financial burden for ICL, because its payment is determined by the number of transactions that go through the system. Industry sources said the company had already spent pounds 30m on the project and was currently losing a further pounds 2m every month. But an ICL spokeswoman denied that the costs were one of the reasons why the company has delayed its flotation until the year 2000.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in