Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Goodwill proposals could sting companies

Sunday 16 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PROPOSALS to change the method of accounting for goodwill may prove to be complex, costly and subjective to apply, and likely to give rise to hits against profits at exactly the time when a company is least able to bear the loss, says Touche Ross, the accountants.

In the first big study of the Accounting Standards Board's proposals on goodwill, which will be circulated in the City today, Touche says that any changes will have a dramatic effect on profits and balance sheets.

Those most affected include Grand Metropolitan, Cadbury Schweppes and Reckitt & Colman, which have included the value of brands in their balance sheets.

Under the ASB proposals, the value of intangible assets such as brands would have to be included as part of goodwill - the difference between the cost of an acquisition and the value of the assets acquired. Under one option, however, goodwill could be retained on the balance sheet as an asset.

Ken Wild, who wrote the submission, attacks the decision to ban brand valuations as a blunt instrument which would lump all intangible assets together. He says brand names should be separated from other intangible assets.

He welcomes the proposal of a 'ceiling test' to allow companies to write down goodwill arising when a business is acquired over a period on the profits it earns. But he proposes that it be amended to allow companies to base the goodwill write-off on the value of their brands. Under his ceiling test, if the brands were still earning profits, the goodwill figure would be maintained. But as profits from the brand fell, the goodwill would gradually be eliminated.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in