Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Getting to grips at Brent

INVESTMENT COLUMN

Magnus Grimond
Tuesday 26 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Chemicals group Brent International has spent most of the 1990s attempting and failing to recover from a hangover caused by over-expansion in the 1980s. Yesterday the new board, led by former finance director Keith Hutchings, signalled its intention to get to grips with the problems at last by slashing the interim dividend from 1.6p to just 0.6p. But the announcement sent the shares plunging 21p down to a recent low of 91p.

The bad news was compounded by disappointing half-way figures, showing pre-tax profits halved from pounds 4.01m to pounds 2.01m in the six months to June. There were mitigating circumstances, principally a pounds 1.02m charge for potential losses. A problem engineering contract caused most of the damage and Brent has provided for the potential costs of closing the entire operation.

But there was an uneven performance from the remaining two businesses. Reorganisation in the industrial division has paid off in a 17 per cent rise in operating profits, but costs remain too high in inks and coatings, where soaring raw material prices shaved pounds 300,000 from the operating total.

More clearly remains to be done. Restructuring cost pounds 372,000 in the first half and the company is warning of a further pounds 1.4m charge in the second. Brent is also grappling with gearing, which stood at 82 per cent in June. The sale of the small Asian operation and surplus properties should help, but investors should not hold their breath for an early restoration of the dividend. Meanwhile, underlying full-year profits of pounds 7m would put the shares on a prospective p/e in the high teens. High enough.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in