George defends Bank's policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Eddie George, Governor of the Bank of England, defended the Bank yesterday against the charge that it is ``congenitally pessimistic'', writes Diane Coyle. The Bank had to err slightly on the side of caution, he said, ``in order to build up policy credibility against the background of the UK's unhappy track record''.
It had also been less over-pessimistic about inflation than many other forecasters, he said in a speech to the Swedish Economics Association. Critics were wrong to conclude that the Bank wanted to bias the economy towards deflation.
Mr George added that the Bank's concern with the control of inflation was, ``as a means to the end of sustained growth in activity and employment.''
The current state of demand did enter the Bank's calculations through its inflation forecast, but this was an uncertain process.
The Governor conceded that the fact that most people think forecasts are either right or wrong meant setting interest rates according to forecasts of the economy two years hence could ``weaken the operational credibility of policy''. The Bank could not afford to consistently overdo its caution.
Despite these difficulties, the inflation target was better than the alternative. Shadowing and then joining the Exchange Rate Mechanism had been a ``disaster'' in his view.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments