Gent to quit Woolf at cost of pounds 7m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SR GENT, the Barnsley-based Marks and Spencer clothing supplier, is withdrawing from its loss-making chain of Susan Woolf high street shops in a move that it estimates could cost pounds 7m, writes Russell Hotten.
The company said it wanted to concentrate on manufacturing, a move welcomed by the City, which marked the shares up 10p to 65p.
Gent's 28-strong Susan Woolf chain was launched in February 1993 and the company planned to open about 50 outlets.
High start-up costs and the recession meant bigger than expected trading losses. The venture cost the company pounds 2m last year, though losses this year were expected to be less. The group now hopes to sell the chain.
Gent said Susan Woolf suffered bigger trading losses than planned. 'This has affected the group's overall result, which is now expected to be below the best market expectations.' Brokers were looking for profits of about pounds 3m this year.
Gent has made provision of pounds 7m to cover the withdrawal, which will be shown as an exceptional charge for the year ended 30 June 1994. The firm expects the negative cash effect of this to be about pounds 1m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments