GEC retreats on boss's pay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GEC is set to back down over the most controversial aspect of the remuneration package it intends to pay George Simpson, its new managing director.
The chairman of GEC's remuneration committee, Lord Rees-Mogg, indicated this weekend that the company was prepared to be flexible over Mr Simpson's bonus scheme - perhaps by raising the share-price growth target - to pacify the institutions.
According to Lord Rees-Mogg, much of the controversy has arisen because the company's room for manoeuvre over the size of Mr Simpson's pay package had been severely curtailed by the generous terms of his contract with Lucas, where he was chief executive for two and a half years.
"The size of the Lucas package dictated the terms to us," Lord Rees-Mogg said. "We had to make sure that we were offering more." While not blaming Lucas outright, Lord Rees-Mogg said that the "low share-price hurdle" of Mr Simpson's GEC share-related scheme was a direct result of matching the similar scheme at Lucas.
However, he reiterated that Mr Simpson was worth every penny. "Of all the people we considered, he was the most outstanding candidate, and we had a duty to the shareholders to get him," he said.
The package, initially worth up to pounds 1.5m a year in salary and pension contributions to Mr Simpson under his fixed three- year contract, stirred renewed "fat cat" anger last week among shareholders when it emerged that Mr Simpson would also receive up to pounds 4.8m-worth of share options if the GEC share price rose by 10 per cent in a six-month period within the life of the contract.
One leading institutional investor in GEC, Norwich Union, said the performance targets for the option scheme were "not challenging" and it would consider voting against Mr Simpson's appointment at the company's annual general meeting next Friday unless the package was modified.
The Association of British Insurers, backed by a number of GEC's institutional investors, will be taking the company to task on Monday over Mr Simpson's bonus structure in a meeting with GEC's chairman, Lord Prior. They will argue that it breaches the guidelines set last year by the Greenbury Committee on Directors' Pay, and their own guidelines about "appropriately demanding" performance criteria.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments