Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Fund managers slam plan for hi-tech index

Lucy Baker
Sunday 05 September 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CITY FUND managers are at odds with IT firms over the London Stock Exchange's proposals to create a separate market for hi-tech companies.

The majority of UK-based IT groups favour a dedicated growth market, but almost three-quarters of smaller company fund managers think the LSE's plans for a new technology stock market called Techmark, to be unveiled later this month, is unnecessary.

The findings, which emerged from a survey by Granville, the investment banking boutique, come as a surprise given the huge support among investment banks, which have long complained that Britain is missing out on the Internet listings boom because of the lack of a suitable market here.

While fund managers acknowledge the difficulties facing growth companies, many of the 72.5 per cent who did not back the Stock Exchange proposals thought changes needed to be made within the LSE itself. An almost uniformly negative view of the Alternative Investment Market, introduced three years ago as a junior market for smaller companies, made the managers sceptical about the success of another new market.

Among fund managers who did favour a new London market for growth companies, 50 per cent said the exchange should be a version of Nasdaq, rather than a new LSE market. The US exchange was rated by fund managers and IT chief executives as providing the best support for growth companies. Sixty three per cent of IT bosses are behind the LSE's Techmark initiative.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in