FSA `should cover mortgages'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE JOINT parliamentary committee examining the proposed legislation for the new Financial Services Authority yesterday recommended the Government widen its scope to include the provision of mortgages and long-term care plans for the elderly.
The committee also recommended splitting the roles of chairman and chief executive, currently filled by Howard Davies, and has proposed a tougher complaints procedure including the appointment of a complaints investigator to protect both the public and firms from abuse of the sweeping powers that the new financial sector regulator will have.
It recommends the investigator be allowed to award compensation in cases of FSA "maladministration", that defendants in FSA disciplinary hearings be entitled to legal aid, and that the practice of routinely awarding costs against defendants in disciplinary hearings be stopped.
The committee, composed of MPs, broadly accepted the thrust of the Government's proposals for bringing regulation of the industry under one roof although one committee member, the Conservative MP David Heathcote-Amory, said the bill was "deeply flawed".
Nevertheless, they all accepted consumers groups' argument that a mortgage is "one of the most significant financial transactions that most people make" and that leaving out responsibility for policing it was a glaring anomaly.
They were also critical of the Government's failure to address the human rights' implications and gave the Government one month to table a response on how the bill can be made compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Lord Burns, the former permanent secretary to the Treasury who chaired the committee, said: "The FSA will become one of the most powerful financial regulators in the world in terms of scope, powers and discretion. The challenge is to deal with wrongdoing but in a way which does not interfere with individual rights."
The Treasury yesterday gave a cautious welcome to the recommendations, saying they required further study. It will find it difficult to reject the recommendations from the committee, which it set up to answer charges that the bill, pledged to be on the statute book next year, has been rushed with insufficient consultation.
Mr Davies welcomed the report. Although there are concerns about the practicality of some the recommendations, there was nothing that "would cause anyone here's brow to furrow," a senior FSA official said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments