Former head of Ofgas prepares to fight allegations: Successor retracts charge that McKinnon acted illegally in approving efficiency schemes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SIR JAMES McKINNON, former director-general of Ofgas, is planning a robust defence against allegations made by his successor he had acted illegally, writes Mary Fagan.
Sir James is furious with Clare Spottiswoode, who said in March that he acted illegally in allowing the costs of energy efficency projects to be passed on to gas consumers as part of their bills.
Ms Spottiswoode later retracted her claim in a letter to the House of Commons Environment Select Committee. She made the original claim when giving evidence.
The row is expected to come to a head tomorrow when the two appear before the House of Commons Environment Committee to give evidence on their different approaches to energy saving funds.
Ms Spottiswoode told the select committee that she believed Sir James had exceeded his powers in approving gas energy efficiency projects, the costs of which are passed through to consumers. 'It is clear to me that the Gas Act did not envisage a role for the regulator in setting taxes,' she said.
She later wrote to the committee saying that, on reflection, she believed Sir James acted within his powers and not unlawfully. However, it is understood that Sir James considers this retraction insufficient and regards her original statements as scandalous.
There has been speculation that Sir James will take legal action. He was not available for comment last night and is thought to be waiting to see what emerges tomorrow before deciding what to do.
The affair is an embarrassment for the Government's Energy Saving Trust, which needs to raise pounds 2bn by the end of the decade to meet environmental targets. It was relying on raising money from a levy on gas and electricity bills.
Ms Spottiswoode has said that such levies amount to a tax on consumers. She believes that allowing costs of energy savings schemes to be passed on to customers is not the job of a regulator.
Sir James approved energy saving schemes worth a few million pounds during his time at Ofgas. Ms Spottiswoode, who took over last November, said that the Energy Savings Trust would like her to approve schemes costing hundreds of millions until the end of the decade. Ofgas estimates that the effect would be to add pounds 25 to the average household bill of pounds 350.
Ms Spottiswoode said she had been worried about the cost to consumers since she took office and decided to take legal advice. In her evidence she said she did not believe Sir James 'did not have the same straight legal advice that I have had.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments