Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former director sues QMH: Group faces pounds 500,000 compensation claim over deputy chairman's departure

Russell Hotten
Thursday 26 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MARTIN MARCUS, former deputy chairman and joint managing director of the troubled hotels group Queens Moat Houses, has issued a writ against the company claiming more than pounds 500,000 compensation.

Queens Moat will fight the action and Andrew Coppel, the new chief executive, said it was not the intention to pay compensation to any director who had left since the shares were suspended in April.

Sources said Mr Marcus filed his writ about two weeks ago, claiming wrongful dismissal and payment for the outstanding two years of his service contract. According to Queens Moat's 1991 accounts the top three directors, of whom Mr Marcus was one, earned a minimum of pounds 265,000 a year. He was said to be on a golfing holiday and not available for comment.

Mr Marcus and the finance director, David Hersey, were suspended in April, and both resigned the following month. Mr Marcus drew criticism for selling 1.1 million Queens Moat shares in February, days before the close season rule barred directors' dealing before publication of the financial results. The Stock Exchange is understood to be looking at the circumstances surrounding the sale.

At Queen Moat's annual meeting yesterday Mr Coppel was asked whether he had uncovered any wrong- doing at the company. 'Certain matters have arisen which are being investigated and they will be dealt with at the appropriate time,' he replied.

Mr Coppel refused to elaborate, much to the annoyance of many shareholders, who criticised him for a lack of information. He could give no indication of the company's current worth nor when the suspension of shares might be lifted.

Other sources said the relisting would not be before the 1992 accounts are published at the end of the year, at the earliest.

Talks with Queens Moat's 64 banks, owed more than pounds 1bn, were progressing and tighter control had been imposed on management at the group's 200 hotels, Mr Coppel said.

The management incentive scheme, which operated at about 70 of the 103 UK hotels and is largely blamed for the troubles, is likely to be wound down. Only 38 hotels now operate the scheme, and Mr Coppel said he had personal reservations about it.

Queens Moat has raised its borrowing limit to pounds 2bn, though this was described as a contingency measure while the audit is conducted. The company's articles allow borrowings of four times asset value. However, Mr Coppel said the pounds 2bn figure did not imply that Queens Moat's assets were pounds 500,000. 'It is a precautionary measure to ensure that we do not breach our facilities when the 1992 accounts are prepared,' he said.

Mr Coppel was not the only one under fire from shareholders. John Bairstow, the former chairman being replaced by Stanley Metcalfe, was expected to attend the meeting. Although still a shareholder, the absentee had 'not got the guts to come and face up to the mess he has landed us in', one woman said.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in