Firms fined pounds 80,000 over pensions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Imro, the fund managers' regulator, is set to fine five of its members up to pounds 80,000 each for their part in the pensions mis-selling scandal.
An announcement of the fines, expected to be levied against Alexander Clay & Partners, Godwins, CE Heath, Sedgwick and Willis Corroon, is likely to be made next week.
The regulator is also expected to gag the companies from giving their own view of how the offences were committed.
This is said to be the brainchild of Dan Waters, director of monitoring and enforcement at Imro, who was recruited from the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
The fines, which follow a year-long investigation into pensions mis-selling by former and existing Imro members, are the heaviest penalty to be imposed by any regulator.
Imro's investigation into 22 firms, many of which transferred into the Personal Investment Authority two years ago, found that about 77,000 pension transfers were carried out by them. Of these, the five firms whose fines are expected to be announced next week carried out about 25,000 transfers. It is thought, however, that only a minority involved bad advice.
A Imro spokeswoman last night refused to comment on the fines. She said the regulator did not impose gagging orders. It expected a firm that had admitted an offence and was fined to abide by that admission and not try to deny or minimise it afterwards.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments