Firm denies Barings link
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BY PETER RODGERS
Ross Capital Markets, a Bermuda-based firm in the hedge fund business, yesterday denied market rumours that it was one of the big investors that dealt with Baring Securities in the derivatives market.
After a day in which traders played a game of guessing which players in the market had brought Barings down by betting against its positions, David Prance, financial controller of Ross, said reports of his firm's involvement were absolute rubbish. "We did not have a relationship with Barings in Singapore. We did have a relationship with Barings in Tokyo, but we did little derivatives trading with them."
Mr Prance added "We are obviously fairly upset that our name is being put around. If we knew who was saying it, we would be taking legal advice."
Mr Prance believes Nick Leeson of Barings was betting on his own that the Japanese share market would stay high. However, dealers said that with Barings seen to be buying futures on the Nikkei index in large numbers, there was a natural risk that, once other big investors caught wind of its position, they would bet against it.
Although most assumed Barings was buying on behalf of a large client, this would not have changed their perception.
Most of the big names in the futures and options market, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, were suggested as likely to have been trading against Barings by selling derivatives once it became clear Mr Leeson was going out on a limb. But rather than a conspiracy this was seen as part of the normal cut and thrust of trading.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments