Finns propose 11th-hour deal to end row over savings tax
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EUROPE HAS proposed an eleventh-hour deal to end the row over its controversial savings tax, by drawing up new plans which could remove most of the administrative costs feared by City firms.
With EU finance ministers due to debate the issue tomorrow, the eve of an EU summit in Helsinki, last minute proposals were being drafted by the European Commission and the Finnish presidency of the EU to break the deadlock.
A Treasury spokesman welcomed the Finnish move. "We will be very happy to look at any proposal in a constructive way," he said. Any compromise would have to protect the City's interests, however.
The UK has been isolated and is threatening to veto the savings directive - which aims to stop EU nationals avoiding tax on their interest earned abroad - arguing that it would drive the City's eurobond market abroad. But under the latest draft plans, companies may simply have to submit the names and addresses of non-resident Europeans receiving interest payments.
Last night the Finnish Finance Minister Sauli Niinisto said he plans to table the compromise tomorrow, adding: "If it is too costly to provide information, why not look for something less costly."
This comment addressed the UK's concern that although a proposal to exchange information could be acceptable, if it were too onerous investment banks would simply go ahead and switch their Eurobond transactions to centres such as Switzerland anyway.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments