Fight to exempt unit trusts from `kitemark' plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE ASSOCIATION of Unit Trusts and Investment Funds is fighting to exempt unit trusts from a new "kitemark" for insurance companies, which is aimed at restoring public confidence in the industry.
Philip Warland, AUTIF director-general, said unit trusts should receive a "free pass" rather than face extra requirements from a new scheme run by the Association of British Insurers (ABI). Unlike the pensions and insurance products tainted by mis-selling scandals, the unit trust industry had no need to boost its public image, he said.
Management of unit and investment trusts, the trustees and the fund itself all have to be authorised, and marketing is also heavily regulated, he pointed out. "There isn't a lot else you can accredit. A lot of life assurers simply don't understand the degree of regulation and authorisation covering an investment fund."
AUTIF rejected the idea of a quality mark when approached by the ABI, but the association pressed ahead with its plan to accredit whole brands, rather than individual products.
An independent accreditation board will decide whether or not to award firms with a quality mark after judging on standards of service, plain English and the suitability of products. Mr Warland said he would prefer it if the standards were set by the independent board, not as announced yesterday, by insurance industry chiefs at the ABI.
The ABI is promising that the scheme will help raise the quality of financial products long before it is formally launched in 2001. Director-general Mary Francis said: "We believe most companies will be determined to get this quality mark."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments