Feltrim names win court claim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BY RUSSELL HOTTEN
More than 1,600 investors in the Lloyd's of London insurance market yesterday won a court battle to prove that the Feltrim underwriting syndicate was negligent in investing their money.
The names - investors whose wealth supports the market - were claiming damages of £525m against the Feltrim syndicate and 59 underwriting agencies.
The level of damages has yet to be set, and the claim is likely to go to appeal. Last year Feltrim names were among those who rejected a global settlement offer from Lloyd's of £220-£240m.
Damon De Laszlo, chairman of the Feltrim Names Association, said the investors were thrilled:"It's the culmination of a four-year battle by the names and their determination has been justified. We are confident we will get a substantial proportion of the sum claimed.''
In his judgment, Mr Justice Phillips found that a significant proportion of Feltrim losses were due to the incompetence of the two main underwriters, Patrick Fagan and Robert Gofton-Salmond.
In a summary of the judgment, Feltrim names' lawyers said Mr Justice Phillips had described Mr Fagan's second witness statement as untrue and said Mr Gofton-Salmond had been negligent.
"This is a devastating document from the Lloyd's management point of view and from the regulatory point of view," Mr De Laszlo said.
The investors had placed their money in what turned out to be highly risky reinsurance businesses, managed by Feltrim. Disasters such as the Piper Alpha platform fire in the North Sea and Hurricane Hugo in the US had caused huge losses.
Last October the High Court found that the Gooda Walker agents at Lloyd's were negligent and awarded compensation estimated at £500m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments