Ex-Barings executive loses claim for pounds 500,000 bonus
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mary Walz, the former Barings executive, has lost her claim for a pounds 500,000 performance bonus that was awarded just hours before the bank's collapse last year but was never paid.
An industrial tribunal at Stratford, east London, ruled yesterday that Ms Walz had no contractual or non-contractual rights to the money.
Ms Walz, 36, an American living in London, claimed she was praised as "a star" by Andrew Tuckey, the former deputy chairman of Barings, when he handed her a slip of paper confirming the bonus in February 1995. Just 13 hours later, the dealings of Nick Leeson, the rogue trader, brought down the bank with losses of pounds 860m.
Ms Walz said previous bonuses had never been linked to the bank's profits. But ING, the Dutch financial services giant which rescued Barings in March 1995, argued she was one of the senior managers responsible for Leeson, who is serving six- and-a-half years in a Singapore jail for his illegal trading.
It said the agreement was informal and since the bank collapsed the next day, there was no profit-sharing pool from which she could be paid.
Ms Walz said yesterday she and her lawyers had believed her meeting with Mr Tuckey in February 1995 had "amounted to more than just a casual indication of my compensation".
But she said: "I put the question before the tribunal for the obvious purpose of seeking its independent review and to attempt to isolate what was strictly an employment issue from the complexities of the tragedy of the collapse of Barings."
"Having put the question to the tribunal, I now accept and respect its decision," she said.
ING Barings declined to comment yesterday. However, one banking source expressed relief at the decision. "It says encouraging things about accountability. There are those of us who thought it was a cheeky thing to do," one banker said.
Ms Walz is also battling to clear her name with the Securities and Futures Authority, the City regulator, which has brought charges against her in connection with the collapse of the bank. In addition, many former Barings executives, including Ms Walz, are being sued by Coopers & Lybrand, the auditors of Barings.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments