Ewart board members threaten chairman with legal action
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE CHIEF executive and other board members of Ewart, the property group, yesterday threatened to take legal action against their own chairman, Brian O'Connor.
The move is the latest twist in an acrimonious battle for control of the Belfast company, which received a new pounds 25.8m bid approach yesterday. Moyne, a shelf company created for the bid by drinks entrepreneur Paul Hunt, yesterday offered to buy Ewart for 79p a share in cash. This compares with last week's 75p revised offer worth pounds 24.6m from Dublin-based Dunloe House and a share price last night of 78.5p, up 3.5p.
A majority of independent board members at Ewart agreed to accept the Moyne approach but Mr O'Connor voted against it and is urging shareholders to accept the lower offer from Dunloe House which already holds a 26 per cent stake in Ewart and has two places on its board. Mr O'Connor owns 16 per cent of Ewart through his Fortress Hill company.
Barry Gilligan, Ewart's chief executive, said: "We are taking up O'Connor's behaviour with the Takeover Panel and are considering whether to take legal action against him." He believed Mr O'Connor was not acting in the interest of shareholders.
Mr O'Connor said in a statement: "I believe the uncertainty created by the bid situation over the past months should be brought to an end. My action is designed to achieve this."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments