Eurostar concerns fuelled by pounds 217m aid fuels point headline goes in here like this
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The viability of Eurostar has again been questioned after claims that the Channel tunnel train operator has received emergency aid of more than pounds 200m, writes Russell Hotten.
European Passenger Services, Eurostar's parent, is due to transfer into the private sector this year, though rival bidders are said to be unhappy about the financial projections.
An extra pounds 217m is believed to have been injected into Eurostar because passenger numbers are well below targets, and because of problems with a multi-million-pound computer system.
Two consortia are left on the shortlist to buy EPS, and the winner will also have to take on the massive task of building the 68-mile high-speed rail link between London and the tunnel.
Eurorail, a joint venture that includes BICC, HSBC Holdings, NatWest Bank and Trafalgar House, has been tipped as the most likely choice. Its rival is London and Continental, consisting of the Virgin Group, Bechtel, Ove Arup, and National Express. Both groups are thought to have told the Department of Transport that their final bids may be lower because EPS has not been as successful as first hoped.
Brian Wilson, Labour's transport spokesman, said yesterday that the extra money, disclosed in Treasury documents, was another acute embarrassment for the Government. This new cash injection was ... simply a sweetener to the consortium that won the bidding, he added.
A spokesman for the Department of Transport declined to discuss the level of subsidy. But he said: "EPS is still in a start-up phase and this inevitably means the Government funding any losses."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments