Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Enmities poison Miller bid for Cala

Anna Minton
Sunday 30 May 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHEN AND how is the bitter battle between the Edinburgh housebuilder Cala and the construction group Miller likely to end?

The saga, which has divided the close-knit Scottish business community, has left shareholders in the highly unusual position of having to decide between two identical bids after the Takeover Panel rejected Miller's appeal and upheld its controversial judgement.

The panel's initial ruling - that Miller could not raise its offer for Cala to its reserve price - hinged on a linguistic point which Miller claims is a technicality.

On 10 May Miller tabled its final pounds 98.6m bid worth 200p a share but reserved the option to increase it to 210p should a higher counter offer emerge from Cala's management buyout vehicle Dotterel.

However, the panel decided that in the event of a matching, rather than increased, offer made for Cala at 200p, Miller would not be permitted to raise its own offer.

City observers over the weekend suggested the management buy-out camp is indeed likely to raise its all-cash bid to 200p tomorrow.

Sources close to Miller described the situation as "ridiculous" and claimed the majority of shareholders, angry at being denied maximum value, backed the construction group's appeal.

"The Cala management, with the help of the Takeover Panel, are helping to frustrate the higher offer. The appeal should be a landmark decision," the source said.

Nonetheless, shareholders should be consoled by the fact that Cala has more than doubled in value since the bid saga began in March, when Geoffrey Ball, the Cala chairman, first attempted his management buy-out with a 165p a share offer.

Five weeks later Miller tabled a 175p a share offer, later topped by Dotterel's 190p a share bid. Finally Miller delivered what it hoped would be its knock-out bid with the reserve price option.

Now observers say there is no doubt that the bidding war is the most fraught Scotland has seen since Highlands Distillers made its move on Macallan Whisky three years ago.

In part analysts believe the unprecedented situation reflects just how undervalued the sector is. However, the increasingly poisonous atmosphere has also been fuelled by rumours of personal friendships and enmities playing their part.

Recent speculation in Scotland has focused on Dotterel's inability to pay a higher price but financial sources say that Morrison Construction, which has a 5 per cent stake in Dotterel, would contribute more equity to stop Cala falling into the hands of arch-rival Miller. Furthermore Sir Fraser Morrison and Mr Ball are well-known to be close personal friends.

To complicate matters further the Cala management bid for independence is being underwritten by the Bank of Scotland while the Royal Bank of Scotland is lined up behind Miller.

As if that wasn't enough Miller recently appointed Bob Speirs, who retired as the Royal Bank finance director in October, as its first chairman from outside the Miller clan.

But as far as analysts are concerned the saga has been going on for far too long while the Takeover Panel's judgement looks unlikely to speed things up.

"While this drags on we're still to get a formal offer on the table. It's in no one's interests to drag it out but the Takeover Panel has put a freeze on the timetable," one analyst said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in