Elon Musk’s ‘Love Me Tender’ tweet prompts speculation over $43bn Twitter bid
Billionaire Tesla boss said to be seeking a direct appeal to Twitter shareholders after social media company’s board launches ‘poison pill’ to thwart takeover
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Elon Musk has posted a cryptic tweet that has been seen as an indication he may be readying a new approach to buy Twitter.
The social media company launched a so-called "poison pill" move to make it harder for Mr Musk or any group of investors to amass a controlling stake in the company.
It came after the world's richest man filed a $43bn proposal to buy Twitter and take it private. It was revealed last week that Mr Musk had built up a 9.1 per cent stake in Twitter and is the social media firm's second-biggest shareholder.
On Sunday, Mr Musk kept investors guessing when he tweeted "Love Me Tender", prompting a flurry of speculation online.
Some commentators have suggested the reference to the famous Elvis Presley song indicates that Mr Musk hopes to appeal directly to Twitter's shareholders. Such a move might allow him to bypass Twitter's board.
Mr Musk earlier tweeted a poll asking users whether they agreed with the statement: “Taking Twitter private at $54.20 should be up to shareholders, not the board”.
In separate comments, the billionaire Tesla chief executive criticised Twitter's board, claiming that its interests are no longer aligned with those of shareholders.
He was responding to a tweet which pointed out that the board “collectively owns almost no shares” after the departure of founder Jack Dorsey.
Twitter's share price was $45.08 before markets opened on Monday, well below Mr Musk's offer of $54.20 per share.
There remain substantial obstacles to any acquisition, however. The social media platform’s board put in place a one-year “Rights Plan” on Friday, the day after it received “an unsolicited, non-binding" proposal from Mr Musk.
Under the plan, shareholders would be given an opportunity to buy Twitter stock at a discounted price, if Mr Musk increases his holdings to more than 15 per cent of the company.
That would water down Mr Musk's stake, making a takeover more difficult.
“The Rights Plan is intended to enable all shareholders to realize the full value of their investment in Twitter,” the board said in a statement,
“The Rights Plan will reduce the likelihood that any entity, person or group gains control of Twitter through open market accumulation without paying all shareholders an appropriate control premium or without providing the Board sufficient time to make informed judgments and take actions that are in the best interests of shareholders.”
While Mr Musk's surprise approach for Twitter has captured the attention of his huge online following, investors have been alarmed by his apparent distraction from running Tesla. Shares in the electric car company have dropped 9.2 per cent in recent days.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments