Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Directors who fail net pounds 23m as their reward

Peter Rodgers Financial Editor
Tuesday 16 July 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The rewards of failure for directors of the top 250 British companies have soared in the first half of this year to pounds 22.8m, almost matching the pounds 23.2m paid in compensation for loss of office for the whole of last year.

A survey by Pirc, the shareholder consultancy firm, found the total payout over the last 30 months was pounds 65m. It said this could have been reduced if the advice of the Greenbury report, published a year ago today, had been followed.

The Greenbury report pressed for a move towards restricting directors' rolling contracts to a year or less, but it accepted there could be special reasons for longer periods.

Anne Simpson, Pirc director, said: "The danger is that the majority of companies are claiming to be the exception."

Although three-year rolling contracts have fallen from 44 per cent before the Greenbury report to 5 per cent of companies surveyed, two-year contracts have more than doubled from 24 to 53 per cent. One-year contracts have risen from 30 per cent in 1993-94 to 40 per cent.

The Pirc report also confirmed widespread criticisms of long-term incentive schemes introduced as a result of the Greenbury report, many of which have easy performance targets and pay out enormous sums if they are fully met.

Pirc found in an analysis of 31 schemes that the long-term schemes offered rewards ranging from 50 per cent of short-term bonus to 400 per cent of directors' basic remuneration. More than half failed to provide sufficient data to calculate the potential gains.

The Greenbury report said performance targets should be stretching, but 42 per cent of schemes paid out in shares for below average performance.

Few schemes disclosed their current ranking against the chosen comparator group of companies, making it impossible to assess whether the target was challenging. Some companies even paid out for earnings-per-share growth in line with economic growth.

And while Greenbury said a three-year performance period should be the minimum, this has become the maximum for more than 90 per cent of schemes. Of 103 companies in the top 350 with long-term plans, only 42 have put them to a shareholder vote, as recommended.

Ms Simpson said: "There is a danger of long-term schemes becoming overly complex and failing in their purpose."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in