Devon measures quality of life
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Citizens in one part of Britain are challenging the assumption that economic activity is the best guide to quality of life, writes Diane Coyle.
The West Devon Environmental Network today launches a project to measure well-being using a mixture of conventional economic statistics and environmental indicators. The group claims it is the first such project to be run by local people for themselves.
The measures used, piloted by Judith Matthews, an academic at the University of Plymouth, will range from unemployment to the incidence of asthma, water quality and damsel fly numbers.
The West Devon initiative is part of a trend that has started to filter through to more conventional assessments. Two new publications compare countries on the basis of environmental and quality of life indicators.
The United Nations Human Development Report and a survey from the OECD include indicators ranging from inequality and unemployment to crime rates and greenhouse gas emissions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments