Davis appointment wrecks Colman deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER Davis's appointment to the Prudential job caused a serious headache in talks over the sale of Reckitt & Colman's food and drinks businesses.
The businesses now look like going to Bass, the brewing and hotels group, for around £300m.
Mr Davis was heading a management buy-in team, backed by Schroder Ventures and Electra, the venture capitalists, which was close to agreeing the deal when he decided to take up the Prudential appointment. "We got to the point where we were just hours away from doing the deal in principle when Peter Davis said he wished to pursue the Prudential offer," said one source.
Following his decision, the Schroder Venture financiers were encouraged to meet Richard Holroyd, who is the managing director of Colman in Norwich.
This was with a view to backing the existing management in a management buyout rather than bringing in Mr Davis as part of a buy-in.
A team flew to Switzerland, where Mr Holroyd was holidaying, and came back with a different view of the businesses' profitability than that given to it previously by Reckitt & Colman's advisers, Goldman Sachs.
Mr Holroyd said the 1994 results had been unusually good because of an exceptionally warm summer, which had inflated demand for Robinson's drinks.
Mr Holroyd also said that the Goldman Sachs forecasts for the soft drinks businesses were based on the group's manufacturing capacity being run to capacity, which he said was unrealistic.
As a result of these meetings the Schroder Ventures team reduced its price by around 20 per cent, and at this stage the Goldman Sachs director Federico Aliboni said he would talk to other interested bidders. If Reckitt & Colman does decide to sell the businesses to a trade buyer such as Bass, this will represent a distinct change in strategy.
Reckitt & Colman had earlier preferred a sale to a financial buyer, partly because it believed that this course of action would result in fewer redundancies.
A spokesman for Reckitt & Colman declined to comment this weekend on the discussions with interested bidders, which are continuing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments