Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

CU growth disappoints shareholders

Lea Paterson
Wednesday 12 November 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Investors in Commercial Union were yesterday disappointed by the insurance company's latest financial results. At prevailing exchange rates, profits for the nine months to September grew a pedestrian 3 per cent.

The results contrast with figures earlier this week from the rival General Accident, which announced a 23 per cent jump in profits. CU shares fell 7 per cent yesterday to 745p.

The strong pound was partly to blame. Under constant exchange rates, operating profits for the group grew 15 per cent.

Though performance was strong in the life sector, which accounts for just under half of CU's business, general insurance had a difficult time. The UK underwriting operation has lost pounds 85m so far this year.

Despite yesterday's tumble in CU shares, analysts' remained pessimistic. "CU shares have been buoyed by recent takeover speculation," said one analyst. "I think a [share] price nearer to 700p would be more reasonable," added another.

- Lea Paterson

Investment column, page 27

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in