Cruickshank to present review findings to banks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DON CRUICKSHANK, the head of the Government's banking review, has written to the chairmen of Britain's eight largest banks seeking a round of one-to-one meetings early next year to present his findings before going public with the results of inquiries towards the end of February.
The request has bolstered hopes that the year-long review may soon be coming to a close.
However, there is also disappointment in some quarters that Mr Cruickshank has not gone as far as the banks would like in meeting their requests for more scope to put forward their own views about improving industry competitiveness.
The review team has largely completed its fact-finding and will now retire to consider the results. The research has involved visits to the United States, Australia, France, Germany, Canada and Scandinavia, with which the British banking sector is being compared.
The banks have been irritated at being asked for large amounts of detail on the profitability of their operations on a product-by-product basis, information which they often do not have, while being denied the opportunity to put their case.
The review, launched by Gordon Brown in November 1998, was initially meant to concentrate on the provision of credit for small businesses but has been widened to include broader consumer issues.
In September, the Chancellor agreed to an indefinite extension. This was to allow more time for Mr Cruickshank - who is also running Action 2000, the government-sponsored campaign - to complete his work.
The banks argue privately that Mr Cruickshank has failed so far to show he understands their market. His interim report, published in September, spoke of greater competition in the US resulting in lower rates for small business lenders, whereas the reality is that banks in the US still largely enjoy regional monopolies, long since swept away in the UK.
The report also highlighted the banks' regulatory framework as a major reason for lack of competition in high interest rates charged on some products. But Mr Cruickshank's request for the Financial Services Authority to take responsibility for promoting competition has been rejected by the Government.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments