Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cross-media rules remain arbitrary

Comment

Tuesday 23 May 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Cross-media rules remain arbitrary

Stephen Dorrell, the National Heritage Secretary, appears to be replacing one arbitrary system with another with his long-awaited package on cross- media ownership. By deciding to limit the television aspirations of dominant national newspaper publishers, Mr Dorrell has managed to cut out just two players - Rupert Murdoch, though his present privileged position remains untouched and Mirror Group, which appears to have been caught in the crossfire.

At the same time, his decision to maintain the limit of two ITV licences per player has stymied the expansionist hopes of a clutch of other media companies, including Granada, which had hoped to buy Yorkshire Tyne Tees and MAI, also covetous of YTT. MAI paid well over the odds for its 14.8 per cent stake in YTT just last week, betting it would win the right to buy the lot.

It is far from clear what Mr Dorrell is trying to achieve with these interim proposals. Yes, there will be scope for television companies to buy newspaper groups. But with the exception of the Express papers, are any national newspapers for sale? And if they are, does anybody really want to buy them in this difficult market? No doubt by chance rather than design the two groups most adversely affected are the Mirror Group, publisher of the Labour-leaning Mirror, and MAI, chaired by Labour peer Lord Hollick. Conspiracy theorists will believe otherwise.

The Government's proposals for the longer term have more merit. The Green Paper promises to limit any one player to 10 per cent of the national market and 20 per cent of regional markets. The chances of this being enacted before the next election look pretty remote, however.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in