Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Court stops Lonrho's Fayed case

John Moore
Friday 24 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A HIGH COURT damages action by Lonrho, the international trading group, and its chief executive, Roland 'Tiny' Rowland, alleging a dirty tricks campaign by the Fayed brothers during the row over the ownership of House of Fraser and Harrods was ordered to be 'struck out' by a judge yesterday, writes John Moore.

Mr Justice Macpherson said the action, launched in July 1991, was another round in the 'prolonged public warfare with no holds barred' between the two sides over the House of Fraser group.

If the action were allowed to go ahead it would inevitably involve raking over the whole dispute with 'mud slung in all directions', he said. 'The court cannot stop the public vendetta, but it can prevent the parties misusing the court as their alternative arena.'

Lonrho and Mr Rowland were ordered to pay the costs of House of Fraser's application to have the action struck out. Lonrho was refused leave to appeal, but its lawyers said later there were good grounds for appeal and further moves would be considered.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in