Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Correction: Levelling the table: Forecasting stars wide of the mark

Saturday 22 August 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Management Today is correcting a table of analysts forecasts attributed to the magazine in last week's Independent on Sunday, following a number of complaints. The table attempted to rank the performance of top analysts by comparing their forecasts with actual profits reported by companies.

Warburg Securities and Hoare Govett have asked us to point out that the forecasts of Unilever's profits attributed to the firms referred to 1992, and not 1991 as stated in the table and an accompanying article, headlined Forecasting stars wide of the mark. It was therefore incorrect to state that Warburg's forecast for last year was the 10th least accurate of the 14 firms that research the sector.

It was also incorrect to attribute the worst forecast of any firm to Hoare Govett. In fact Hoare Govett's forecast of Uniliver's profits for 1991 was relatively close to the actual outcome. Henry Cooke Lumsden was incorrectly placed as the worst forecaster of Racal's profits. Its forecast of pounds 148m for 1991 included the profits of Racal Telecom, which was since demerged.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in