Concern over Jersey law shift
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The role played by the accountants Price Waterhouse and Ernst & Young in the drafting of Jersey's controversial limited liability partnerships law is to be investigated by a committee of inquiry. Although the law was finally approved by the States of Jersey two weeks ago, the use of leading QCs to assist in its drafting - alleged to have cost the accountancy firms in excess of pounds 1m - has raised serious concerns.
The law, the first of its kind in Europe, will enable large partnerships to protect their partners' personal assets from litigation.
Price Waterhouse was responsible for setting the law drafting process in motion, suggesting through a letter from its lawyers to the island's finance authority that it would be keen to register as a limited liability partnership (LLP) in Jersey if suitable legislation was enacted.
The letter also intimated that Ernst & Young would also leave the City and re-register in Jersey, prompting the Deputy Prime Minister, Michael Heseltine, to try to persuade the big six accountancy firms to remain in London.
The committee of inquiry approved by the States of Jersey yesterday will also investigate the speed with which the law was drafted. It appears to have been "fast tracked", taking precedence over many other laws waiting to be drawn up.
This fast tracking led to allegations of sleaze being made against a senior politician, Reg Jeune, who is head of the committee responsible for the island's law drafting programme and a consultant to the legal firm that lobbied on behalf of Price Waterhouse.
The allegations, hotly denied and never substantiated, led to the expulsion from the States of Jersey of the young backbencher who made them, Stuart Syvret, but neither the allegations nor the expulsion is to be examined by the committee of inquiry, whose terms of reference restrict it to procedural matters.
Jersey's government does not yet have the legal power to set up an independent committee of inquiry - ironically the legislation that would allow this was one of the items overtaken by the LLP law. The committee will therefore comprise States members, a move that was strongly criticised yesterday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments