Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Commentary: When plus can mean minus

Tuesday 30 June 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When is negative growth really a recovery? When it is in Britain, and the recovery begins in the second quarter. At least, that is what the Chancellor must hope.

With the downgrading for this year, the independent forecasters are now predicting negligible growth of 0.4 per cent. This, though, gives a misleading impression of what is really expected. The figure refers to the change in the average level of gross domestic product between last year and this year. The sharp fall during last year meant that GDP at the end of the year was much lower than the average. There has to be an equally sharp rise during this year to stop the year-on-year comparison dropping.

Even if GDP were to grow by 0.5 per cent in each of the second, third and fourth quarters, there would still be a very small year-on-year decline because of the depressed starting point in the first quarter. Since such a steady rebound seems altogether unlikely, the real surprise is that the forecasters are expecting any growth at all on a year-on-year basis.

Part of the explanation for their apparent optimism lies in the time-lags: many of the forecasters have not produced new sets of predictions since the gloomy figures for the first quarter came out. Excluding all the forecasts prepared before June, the average growth rate comes down to a mere 0.2 per cent.

Even this looks too rosy, given the forecasters' record for deferring the starting point of the recovery every quarter. Yesterday's figures for the savings ratio - the proportion of income saved rather than spent - show a further rise to 11.5 per cent. People still want to play safe, which means there is only the weakest of motors for the recovery. What happens if output is flat from the first quarter onwards? The year-on-year comparison would show a drop of 0.8 per cent. Wonderful thing, arithmetic.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in