Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Commentary: On your bike, cyclicals

Wednesday 05 August 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Those cynics who believe that you can prove anything with statistics will take considerable satisfaction from the behaviour of the cyclical indicators, published by the Central Statistical Office to provide advance warning of peaks and troughs in economic activity.

The indicators - weighted averages of economic, financial and business survey information - agree that the economy reached a turning point in spring this year. Unfortunately, they cannot agree whether it was the start of recovery after a three-year slowdown or the start of a slowdown after an 18-month recovery.

Understandably, the financial markets and the Treasury now virtually ignore the cyclical indicators - and the Central Statistical Office is planning to revamp them by the end of the year.

The cyclical indicators were reasonably good predictors until the 1980s, since when they have fallen victim to the substantial structural changes in the economy and the financial system. A good example is the longer leading indicator (LLI), which is supposed to pinpoint peaks and troughs around 10 months in advance. This forecast a recovery beginning in early 1990 and ending late last year, since when the economy appeared to dip down again.

Of course, no such recovery took place. The LLI was boosted by a rising stock market and unusually over- optimistic responses to the Confederation of British Industry's surveys of manufacturers.

The CSO will have to start again from scratch if the cyclical indicators are ever again to deserve investors' trust.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in