Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Commentary: No kick-start for property

Tuesday 20 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Buyers who cannot move home because their mortgage is larger than the value of their house may be helped by yesterday's move by the Government to prise open the jaws of the negative equity trap.

But allowing building societies to advance unsecured loans of up to pounds 25,000, rather than the previous limit of pounds 10,000, is not going to provide a magic answer - even for the limited number of borrowers who are likely to get a sympathetic hearing from the societies.

Borrowers with mortgage arrears or other financial problems are completely outside the scope of this policy shift and will certainly derive no advantage. It is aimed at people with secure income who can manage their current level of debt, even though it is no longer fully backed by the value of the property.

So, for instance, someone who had the promise of a new job in another part of the country might be able to bridge the gap between the value of their current property and the mortage on it with an unsecured loan, and hence be able to move.

But there will still be mortgage indemnity insurance to pay, and probably a higher rate of interest for the unsecured part of the loan. The option of moving and carrying the old debt along to the new property might not look so attractive after all. It will only appeal to those for whom a move is imperative.

Abbey National, which converted from a building society to a bank and therefore freed itself from the restrictions on unsecured lending, has a self-imposed limit of pounds 10,000 for these sort of loans and has made just a handful.

So this move is no kick-start for the property market, although it may help a few homeowners to swap one impossibly large debt for another, just as long as they can keep on paying the monthly mortgage bill.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in