Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Commentary: Myths from the nuclear sector

Tuesday 28 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Had visitors from Mars dropped in on yesterday's Nuclear Electric results, they could have been forgiven for assuming that they were listening to a private company.

Profits up by nearly half, productivity improved by 24 per cent, operating costs down by 22 per cent and a pounds 250m provision to cover 3,500 redundancies. The stuff of a tightly run commercial utility.

Sadly, this, as we earthlings know, is pure poppycock. Nuclear Electric is state-owned. It is also light years from operating in a commercial environment for two simple reasons. First, its customers must, by law, consume all the power it produces. Second, because nuclear electricity remains hopelessly uneconomic to generate, they must also pay an 11 per cent levy on their electricity bills for the privilege.

Given that Nuclear Electric made operating profits of pounds 482m last year, it seems not unreasonable to ask whether such a high levy, or any levy at all, remains justified.

The Government says it is if Britain wants to maintain a healthy diversity of electricity supplies. John Collier, chairman, justifies the levy on the grounds that someone has to pay for the company's pounds 8bn worth of decommissioning and waste management liabilities.

He adds, however, that his goal is to report an operating profit, without the artifical crutch of the levy, in 1995 - a hint that Nuclear Electric may one day follow its fossil-fuel friends into the private sector.

If it is serious about becoming commercial, it should try shaving the levy and delivering cheaper power to Britain's energy-intensive industries.

Even then, privatisation will surely remain science fiction. The private sector showed three years ago that it would not assume the liabilities without an astronomic cheque from the taxpayer. Three years hence, Nuclear Electric is just as much in alien territory. As Captain Collier might say, Beam me up, Scottie.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in