Commentary: Lloyd's running out of time
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lloyd's of London, once the proudest of insurance institutions, is lurching deeper into crisis. The market's authorities are expected to report losses of up to pounds 2bn this year.
This figure would be remarkable except that last year Lloyd's reported losses
of pounds 2bn and in 1991 losses of pounds 500m. By any standards of business practice, including the variable standards of the insurance industry, that performance in such a brief period of time is little short of disastrous.
If Lloyd's were a joint stock company, shareholders would demand that the directors be fired and would be calling for a full-scale Department of Trade and Industry inquiry into the background of the losses. Lloyd's is different. It regulates itself, being accountable to the DTI only on matters concerning financial ratios.
Despite its freedoms, Lloyd's in the past year or so has been obliged to respond to political and public pressure to deal with its trading problems. The management has been strengthened under its own private legislation dating back to the 1870s.
There is brave talk before the 20,000 members, who provide Lloyd's with its money to function. New managers whistle hopefully that help for losses may be on the way. But the divisions about the scale of any likely assistance from the Inland Revenue or elsewhere only show how rash Lloyd's would be to rely upon a beneficent deity for a solution.
Lloyd's is still short of a plan. Unless it finds a way to reconcile its ambitions for the next few years with a sensible plan to raise money to fill the gap left by defaulting underwriting members, it may not have a future. Those providing capital need complete confidence that their interests will be protected. Time is not on Lloyd's side.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments