Commentary: Going for broke at the Bank
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Prime Minister's choice of the next Governor of the Bank of England should, on past performance, have been announced just before Christmas. Downing Street is running late, and a decision is likely in weeks rather than days. In many ways, the later the better. A long delay could be a sign that the suc
cessful candidate is locked in negotiation with the Government about the remit. There will never be a better chance to influence the terms of employment.
The Government is against making the Bank formally independent (although it must do so, under the Maastricht treaty, if it decides to opt into a single European currency). But it has committed itself to more openness in policy-making, and has asked the Bank to assess every three months the Government's progress towards its 2 per cent inflation target.
It would be a useful innovation to publish the sort of exchange of letters that occurs on the appointment of the chairman of a nationalised industry and its sponsoring minister. These 'objectives letters' set out the precise areas over which the new chairman is to be given clear responsibility, those reserved to the secretary of state, and those over which there should be consultation.
The new Governor could insist, for example, on editorial freedom in publishing the Bank's inflation assessment. He or she could ask for freedom to criticise policy in speeches, and he or she could even insist on the specific right to call publicly for rises in interest rates. Any Chancellor would then go to considerable lengths to placate a Governor who threatened to do so.
Such an arrangement would not be full-scale independence, but it would help to make the Bank a more effective counterweight. The new Governor now has an unusual opportunity to re-establish the Old Lady's influence. It should not be missed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments