Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trying things in a ‘sandbox’ is not as daft as it sounds

Outlook

James Moore
Tuesday 10 November 2015 21:09 EST
Comments
The idea was born out of the mandate to promote competition imposed upon the FCA when it was created by George Osborne
The idea was born out of the mandate to promote competition imposed upon the FCA when it was created by George Osborne (Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

“Sandboxing” is a silly name for what could be a sensible idea on the part of Britain’s chief financial watchdog. The aim is to allow firms to “test” new products without getting hammered if things go horribly wrong. They’d do this by putting them in a regulatory (ahem) sandbox. The same could apply to new businesses wanting to try out ideas before getting authorised.

The idea was born out of the mandate to promote competition imposed upon the FCA when it was created by George Osborne. Companies taking part will probably have to accept that they’ll need to compensate people who take a punt on their new offerings if things go wrong, while consumers will have to accept that they’re taking something of a leap of faith.

However, if such ground rules can be established, then why not? Not only could the process make things quicker, it has the potential to expose flaws and highlight issues that need addressing before products and services are released to the wider market.

Communication between the regulator and the firms it oversees hasn’t always been what it might be and this could help improve that by creating a closer relationship. Just as long as it’s not too close.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in